On Spotting Fakes
A hotel I worked at had posted in its back office area a list, from the local police department, of signs of potentially suspicious activity. The list was meant to alert the hotel staff to possible illegal activities being conducted by guests in the hotel. Many of the items were completely ordinary and normal, but when several were found together they might indicate some nefarious activity is afoot.
Now mind you, this was a rather nice hotel and not some seedy fly-by-night operation. However, it was on a busy interstate highway and drug trafficking was a concern. The local police requested the desk staff notify them if illegal activity was suspected.
With fakes, overruns, private issues and other items of dubious authenticity becoming common on eBay, I propose a similar list for Scout patches. No single item is enough to brand a patch unauthentic, but when taken together and combined with a healthy dose of skepticism identifying dubious items and sources can become much easier. This list is specifically focused on identifying Order of the Arrow patches.
Here’s my proposed list:
- The seller lists the item location as somewhere in Southeast Asia. While there is an active Scouting and collecting community in Asia, be aware that many dubious, fake or counterfeit issues originate there.
- Item location given as somewhere outside the United States. This is closely related to the first item. It is a bit redundant but still worth stating. The Order of the Arrow is specific to the BSA and its patches are collected mainly by Americans. Even though there are large “expat” communities in many countries, it would be unusual for someone outside the US to have a quantity of OA patches for sale.
- Patch comes from a different location than claimed in the auction desciption. Usually you won’t know about ths until after you have received the item, though sometimes buyers will comment about this in the seller’s feedback on eBay. One seller says the items are located in Tours, France but the items are sent to the buyers from China.
- Seller displays a poor command of the English language. Even if the item location is claimed to be within the US on the auction page this is not necessarily true. A seller’s poor command of the English language is often obvious. If one is familiar with how English is (badly) spoken by those in other countries, it is often easy to peg someone as a non-native speaker living in China or a southeast Asian country.
- Seller displays ignorance of the material through poorly written auction descriptions. The seller may use incorrect terms to describe the patch, eg. confusing CSP and OA flap. He may stumble over lodge names, numbers, dates, or other writing on the patch. He may also make rather odd comments about the patch. For example, one seller of questionable material talks about sewing the item on a racing overall!
- Item listed is a rare modern issue being sold by someone outside the lodge’s area. The rare and restricted modern issues tend not to leave their general area. They generally stay within the lodge, state, or section. Be skeptical if someone with no apparent connection to the lodge is selling this type of material.
- Item is a recent piece that has escaped the eyes knowledgeable “catalogers”. Most collectors and contributors to various catalogs and websites are quite familiar with their own areas. Be wary of something recent (but not brand new) that has not been documented.
- Seller also lists a large number of police, fire, EMS service, racing or similar patches. All these patches are also collected by either members of these services or fans. Ironically the public service and law enforcement patch hobbies are rife with Chinese made fakes Beware if you see a seller pushing these patches along with Scout items.
- Seller will accept only PayPal or money orders in payment. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this but when combined with other items on this list, should cause a potential bidder to first engage his sense of skepticism.
- Seller will accept only cash as payment. This should be obvious. Beware!
- A seller who has previously only listed low valued items suddenly offers a high-priced piece. This, too, is a general warning signal of potential fraud. While it can happen (and does), rare material doesn’t normally pop up in the hands of a casual or low-end collector. You could well find yourself with a fake. Also, there is an actual scam that has been practiced online where a seller pumps up his feedback rating with faked sales of low priced items before duping someone into paying him for a high priced item that he never will send.
Can you think of any others?
Remember, no one item on the list should be taken as proof the seller is listing dubious items. Many legitimate sellers could be erroneously adjudged as selling fakes if this list was sufficient to brand someone. However, combine a few of these together and mix in a knowledge of what one collects, and one should be able to properly engage a prudent sense of skepticism when warranted.


John, You had to be reading my mind. The first Ittawamba service flap sold by sunbrillante falls into just about every category above in your blog. I personally have it in-hand. We are still trying to get a translation from the envelope delivered from China, as it contains a return address in Chinese ( or other language ) so that we can determine the source of this “fake”. Looking at the patch though, with a valid authentic patch next to it, it is nearly impossible to tell the difference. My son, Brian, has made color and overlay comparisons of the two, and they are unmistakeabely identical, which brings the question that the ‘fake’ may have been done on the same loom run with the same setup and thread. So is it truly a “fake”? And if it is not a “fake”, then how should it be categorized, since I didn’t ‘earn” it thru the normal channels. “Replica”, “duplicate” and all of the other words that come to mind do not describe it aptly. If you need more on the color/comparison info, I can put you in contact with Brian. In Service, Mike I.
Michael Irick: If you can send a scan of the label to apieka@aol.com, I can send it to my brother for translation (he lives in China).
Robert Mathis
I bought an Enda Lechauhanne 57 patch from the same seller and was also surprised to find that the back had the “certified” lamination/plastic backing to differentiate between “fakes” and the real ones. That guy is clearly the manufacturer of these items … and I don’t believe these are fakes but rather overruns from the same loom/batch.
I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding On Spotting Fakes, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong
Daniel, of course any one of these criteria alone are perfectly legitimate and really don’t mean much. I tried to be clear about that. Take several of them together and one should become very skeptical of what’s being offered.
Would you suggest different signs or criteria?
I’ve come up with more warning signals that I should have included and may make another post about that soon.
Robert Mathis received a translation of the envelope mentioned in an earlier comment above. Here it is:
“… I’m assuming the dude’s name is Qiu Long from where it’s written (the last two characters at the bottom, plus Qiu is a surname and Long means dragon, which is very dude).
The address is in Henan Province, east central China, just west of halfway between here and Shanghai, and Zhengzhou is the capital of the province.
I would suspect in the western suburbs, as it is a development district (where new construction happens, or where people dream of development coming).
What’s the story on the envelope? Is the guy a Chinese patch collector? Is he in the patch manufacturing business? He has stamps for stamping his name and address, but no company name. If he is in business, he is a small timer I would think, quick to pick up and change business scope.
I hope this helps.”
It doesn’t help all that much since we still can’t identify the company name.